In times of crisis or turbulence in a country, we all rely on media to keep updated. Because the turbulence or movements or protests is not geographically spread evenly across the whole nation. Moreover, even before it spreads across the whole country, it starts in one place and then slowly spreads across.
The speed and intensity with which a movement picks up pace depends much on how media portrays the whole unfolding scenario. Often the state tries to silence or present a sober picture. But in an age of social media, the tiny bits and pieces of information and citizen "reporting" exposes the lacuna.
The risk is when the state official media does not present the whole truth or consciously avoids essential elements of the report. Then democracy itself is at risk. On the other hand, social media points to the facts but is not necessarily always reliable. Those media channels are not responsible to anyone and hence liable to be hijacked if the individual so chooses to. Caught between this awareness that the state media isn't entirely objective and the risk of relying on social media content, the receiver is now forced to make a personal judgement.
