Today was a very new experience. Not really new but different. As part of the work-in-progress sharing that we had I presented what I thought was the method of seeking and applying verification criteria for language and meaning, especially that of Taylor. For this I used the notion of 'semantic holism' as conceived by Willard Quine.
I was quite happy with what I had come up with. For this presentation, unlike my previous presentations, I had the whole text typed out verbatim. And it turned out that I was the only one among the four of us presenting and sharing, who had the whole text typed and 'ready'. Anyway, what bowled me out completely was the first and only question my supervisor asked: So, what are the criteria for 'human meanings'? I just didn't know! And all along I thought I had hit jackpot by way of knowing the answer!!
However, after a few minutes (during the break!) it struck me that what I had actually and accidently stumbled upon was not the criteria for verification, but the certainty that an epistemological verification is possible and also a method to carry it out. I still did not have any defined criteria, but I now knew for sure and could prove that criteria could be provided or sought!
Talk about throwing a stone at a particularly enticing mango, picking one up from the ground, only to look up and see that the one you aimed for and actually wanted is still up there, but thrilled that you now have one in hand and walking back home with the confidence that I can throw stones and aim for mangoes! That's quite a feeling - after long!
I was quite happy with what I had come up with. For this presentation, unlike my previous presentations, I had the whole text typed out verbatim. And it turned out that I was the only one among the four of us presenting and sharing, who had the whole text typed and 'ready'. Anyway, what bowled me out completely was the first and only question my supervisor asked: So, what are the criteria for 'human meanings'? I just didn't know! And all along I thought I had hit jackpot by way of knowing the answer!!
However, after a few minutes (during the break!) it struck me that what I had actually and accidently stumbled upon was not the criteria for verification, but the certainty that an epistemological verification is possible and also a method to carry it out. I still did not have any defined criteria, but I now knew for sure and could prove that criteria could be provided or sought!
Talk about throwing a stone at a particularly enticing mango, picking one up from the ground, only to look up and see that the one you aimed for and actually wanted is still up there, but thrilled that you now have one in hand and walking back home with the confidence that I can throw stones and aim for mangoes! That's quite a feeling - after long!
No comments:
Post a Comment