Another key point Prof. Tim Crane made while presenting ideas from his latest book, The meaning of belief, was the notion of tolerance. Beginning with historical origin of this word he explained how it initially was very much associated and connected with suffering. It then basically meant accepting suffering for having no means of escape from it. However over the years the meaning of the word tolerance has undergone a shift but is now slowly turning into something very different and harmful!
In the context of religion and religious tolerance, the word takes a different meaning. It is not that religion or religions are to be tolerated in as much as they cause suffering yet for no other alternative we accept them. It is not even that we let other religions exist side by side, for want of peace. This would mean that we resist anything that 'offends' other religions. We respect them. Prof. Crane said that's an inappropriate and unhealthy notion of tolerance. Tolerance, on the contrary, involves disapproval, and does not involve respect. His position was that we need not respect beliefs. In fact, many beliefs, especially religious beliefs are not worthy of respect! Rather he stated that we need to respect people, respect believers, not beliefs. He just stopped short of saying 'Respect believers, tolerate beliefs'! Moreover he spoke of tolerance as a practical attitude rather than a theoretical stand. However, he was open to accept that this notion of tolerance, limits of it, actual practical entailment of this, are still vague and not well defined in his thought.
He was mentioning of an article by Bernard Williams on Tolerance... should read up that.
In the context of religion and religious tolerance, the word takes a different meaning. It is not that religion or religions are to be tolerated in as much as they cause suffering yet for no other alternative we accept them. It is not even that we let other religions exist side by side, for want of peace. This would mean that we resist anything that 'offends' other religions. We respect them. Prof. Crane said that's an inappropriate and unhealthy notion of tolerance. Tolerance, on the contrary, involves disapproval, and does not involve respect. His position was that we need not respect beliefs. In fact, many beliefs, especially religious beliefs are not worthy of respect! Rather he stated that we need to respect people, respect believers, not beliefs. He just stopped short of saying 'Respect believers, tolerate beliefs'! Moreover he spoke of tolerance as a practical attitude rather than a theoretical stand. However, he was open to accept that this notion of tolerance, limits of it, actual practical entailment of this, are still vague and not well defined in his thought.
He was mentioning of an article by Bernard Williams on Tolerance... should read up that.
No comments:
Post a Comment